Saturday, March 28, 2026

Philosophy week 3

The discussions about Reality continued! Previous posts in this series:


This week we considered the new spider species, Taczanowski waska.

I began by reading a section of Zombie Makers: True Stories of Nature's Undead by Rebecca L. Johnson.

Side note: This is a sensational book! Here are all the species included

    Chapter 1: A Fungus Among Us

    Zombie Maker: Fungus, Entomophthora muscae
    Zombie Victim: Housefly, Musca domestica
    North America and Europe

    Zombie Maker: Fungus, Ophiocordyceps unilateralis
    Zombie Victim: Carpenter Ant, Camponotus leonardi
    Southeast Asia


    Chapter 2: The Worms Crawl In, The Worms Crawl Out

    Zombie Maker: Hairworm, Paragordius tricuspidatus
    Zombie Victim: Cricket, Nemobius sylvestris
    Europe

    Zombie Maker: Guinea Worm, Dracunculus medinensis
    Zombie Victim: Human, Homo sapiens
    Africa


    Chapter 3: Can We Eat the Babyitter?

    Zombie Maker: Jewel Wasp, Ampulex compressa
    Zombie Victim: Cockroach, Periplaneta americana
    tropical parts of Africa, South Asia, and the Pacific Islands

    Zombie Maker: Parasitoid Wasp, Glyptapanteles
    Zombie Victim: Moth Caterpillar, Thyrinteina leucocerae
    North and South America


    Chapter 4: Going Viral

    Zombie Maker: Rabies Virus
    Zombie Victim: Mammals
    Every country except Australia and New Zealand


    Chapter 5: Try Me, You'll Like Me

    Zombie Maker: Roundworm, Myrmeconema neotropicum
    Zombie Victim: Giant Gliding Ant, Cephalotes atratus
    rain forests of Central and South America

    Zombie Maker: Protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii
    Zombie Victim: Rats and other warm-blooded animals
    Everywhere cats are found


For this lesson, I read them the Ophiocordyceps unilateralis chapter (victim: carpenter ants). Then we reviewed Kings Play Chess On Fine Grains of Sand, also known as Linnaean classification.

    It is easiest to explain this using our own species Homo sapiens!

    Kingdom: Animals

    Phylum: Vertebrates

    Class: Mammals

    To further explain Order: Primates
    we like to play Primate Bingo

    To further explain Family: Hominids
    we like to play the Hunters and Gatherers Simulation Game

    Genus: Homo

    Species: sapiens


After that quick review, I read them a New York Times article from Mar 20:


Now, on to the Philosophy discussion:

Did Taczanowski waska exist before it was discovered?

AAR - Yes, it was alive before it was discovered, that one. If it wasn't, it would have to be just made. It was there before that second he found it.

FR - Yes. Things like that need lots of time to evolve. And that seems like it's been doing it for a while, playing dead. So yes I think it did.

Z - You can't. You can't prove it.

AAR - Unless there's footprints or something. But it's not heavy enough to make footprints.

CB - I don't think that it was real. You can't prove that it's there before it's been spotted or made. How do you know if it's there if no one ever saw it before he spotted it?

EF - Yes, it existed. It has to be made before someone finds it. Because if it's made after, well, if someone finds eggs, that's one way that you could. But if something already hatches and you find that, it has to be made before.


If we are sure that something exists because we have the evidence, was it real before we had the evidence?

CB - You can't, there's no way to prove that it's real if you don't have evidence before you found it.

Z - Yes, but, if you have evidence now and you didn't have evidence before, is it not real before?


FR is making the argument that that evolution takes time. How do we know that the rules of evolution are the same for this species?

CB - We don't have the evidence of that. We don't have a report of when it was actually here before they found it, and figured it out. We don't know when it came to Earth.

FR - Evolution takes time. Look at the simple things; those still took thousand of years to evolve. If they took years and years to evolve, what about this spider? It's a lot more difficult. Plus it's mimicking an organism that's been infected. That takes time to build a disguise like that for wildlife. It can't just be around for like 20 days or something. It had to be around for at least a few decades at least.

AAR - It can't just pop into nature. So many other creatures took so long to evolve. So this creature must have taken a long time to evolve too. It can't just go in just like that. It needs time to evolve those tentacles. It can't just see an organism dying and be like, oh that's a good idea and then tentacles pop out. It can't just do that.

Z - How would this species know that this fungus exists? It wouldn't know how to mimic it, if it didn't know that that fungus existed and what it looked like and what it did to the other spiders. (That's not evidence to me. I'm just arguing that.)



Here's the Wikipedia page for this new spider. From that page, "Arachnologist Nadine Dupérré subsequently located another specimen, collected in Bolivia in 1903, in the holdings of a museum in Germany."

So our evidence for its existence goes back to 1903. Did it exist before then? Can you explain in what way it existed before it was discovered?


This post contains affiliate links to materials I truly use for homeschooling. Qualifying purchases provide me with revenue. Thank you for your support!

No comments: